White Guilt Jumps the Shark

In a move that can be described only as bizarre, Starbucks has adopted a policy encouraging its employees to discuss race relations with customers while serving their coffee.

Most of us react to this with revulsion, and Starbucks’ idiot VP of Global Communications Corey duBrowa has been shouted down for this in righteous fashion. But I think it’s important to explore why this policy is so ridiculous, because its ridiculousness transcends mere white guilt.

The traditional view of human relationships is that there exist various “spheres;” the private, the professional, the academic, and the political, to name a few. The way one acts and conducts oneself may vary significantly between those spheres because it may be helpful to emphasize different personality traits depending on present company.

But the liberal view is that any delineation between the public and private realms is wrong, because it’s oppressive in that it rewards people for acting publicly in ways which aren’t in exact accordance with how they act in private. In other words, any separation between the spheres is a violation of freedom of expression. It does not support their agenda of total liberation ideology. Therefore, the traditional boundaries on conversations between people in a public setting must go.

For example, the discussion of race relations would, under traditional order, be limited to the private, academic, and political spheres. It is inappropriate for a person to whom you relate in only the public sphere to engage you in a discussion of race relations. It is annoying; it is an invasion. And even liberals admit this — just read some of the responses from liberals in the linked article.

So it seems that, subconsciously, even liberals are drawn to the traditional order and hierarchy I support unabashedly and vocally.

White Guilt Jumps the Shark

My views on race

I make a lot of references to race as well as generalizations based on race, and I think it’s important to be very clear about what I mean when I say these things. It is often impractical to provide an explicit point-by-point explanation of terminology in the middle of a post that involves other elements.

To begin with, let me first say that I reject completely the white nationalist/supremacist views on race; namely, that there is an intrinsic “goodness” associated with whites which is not present in people of other races. This is a pseudoscientific belief with no basis in material reality. As a materialist, I assume that all human behavioral traits have their roots in biology. Those traits, regardless of a person’s race, fall somewhere along various spectra. Where your traits lie on those spectra determines who you are.

That said, there is no reason to assume, in the presence of evidence to the contrary, that the distribution along each personality spectrum is the same for all races. We know that this is objectively false with regard to physical features, so why we would assume it to be true for psychological and intellectual ones is inexplicable.

Of course, that is a reference to a distribution across an entire subset (race) of humanity, and doesn’t address individuals within each subset. The truth is that there will be individuals of remarkable intelligence, compassion, determination, and courage of every race. This is analogous to the existence of extremely large-built and physically powerful Asians as well as very small and unimposing blacks. But that does not preclude the possibility that these traits are distributed differently over each subset of humanity.

My sense of things is that the good traits, as well as the bad traits, are not distributed the same over every race. I’ve provided sources supporting this view in the past, but will refrain from doing so at this juncture, as this is simply a statement of my views so that my references to race (in the past and future) have some context. As a result, we should not expect every race to be represented equally in all fields of human endeavor. For example, it does not alarm me that fewer than twelve percent of particle physicists are black, or that an extremely disproportionate number of recipients of the Nobel Prize in Physics are Jewish. If anything, I think these facts reflect differences in the underlying distributions of intellectual capacity.

In general, my view is that individuals ought to be judged by the content of their character, and that, on an individual basis, race is irrelevant. But I think it is perfectly reasonable and useful to make generalizations about the collective, or average behavior within races. On the other hand, such generalizations should not be used to deny individuals access to specific institutions.

Reasonable comments expressing reasonable opinions are welcome on this blog. Comments expressing views which I consider outside the scope of civilized discussion (such as those positing the existence of an “intrinsic goodness” of any particular race) will not be posted, except for the purpose of an example of logical inconsistency.

My views on race

Living under the reign of terror

The Pelham Manor chief of police has narrowly escaped excommunication from the church of liberalism, instead being sentenced to mere reeducation. Please pardon the hyperbole.

Let us take account of Chief Mosiello’s crimes (all of which were perpetrated through private email communication):

1) Making “crude jokes stereotyping African Americans as frequently incarcerated and uninterested in working” [At least the former of these two claims is true]

2) Suggesting that “black women of having many children so they can collect welfare checks” [Well, it certainly isn’t because of their commitment to family life]

3) Claiming that “undocumented Hispanic workers get to keep all their off-the-books income” [This is obviously true]

4) Calling a young woman with eight kids “the new breadwinner in the family” because her mother gets social service checks to care for her kids [Whether or not this was a reference to an actual person, it’s objectively funny]

Furthermore, we have this:

The emails were brought to the board’s attention last year by retired police Officer Mark Lenci. Lenci, forced to retire last year in the face of disciplinary charges related to an arrest of a black man, said he confronted Mosiello with the emails in late December and suggested he resign only to have the chief curse him out.

In other words, Chief Mosiello was targeted for retribution by an officer he had forced out of the department for disciplinary reasons.

So a chief of police, making humorous references and observations regarding only certain behaviors of our “protected classes” (as opposed to making references to their intrinsic nature, which would be another matter) via a private form of communication, can face fines on the order of tens of thousands of dollars and mandatory “counseling” to realign his views with those politically authorized. This is the reign of terror.

Living under the reign of terror

It’s that time of year again

That’s right, folks, it’s Black History Month (known as “February” to racist whites). NJ.com gets us off to a strong start with the same old story we’ve been told for years. Here’s the article, with my comments in bold.

Rutgers Today talked to Khadijah White about why Black History Month is important as the university plans a series of events in observance. White, an assistant professor of journalism and media studies in the School of Communication and Information, researches race, gender and politics in media.

Why is Black History Month relevant?

There has long been a contention among student and teacher activists that educators in this country, who are predominantly white, would not teach about black history at all if it weren’t for people explicitly setting aside space and time for it. Now, at least for this month, students can learn about how African-Americans quite literally built this society and provided its foundation in so many ways. [This is preposterous because it implies differentiation of “histories” on the basis of race, which is an objectively ridiculous assertion (it reminds me of the Strong Programme, that self-parody of postmodern philosophy). If I were to study African history, I would likely find myself primarily focused on individuals and peoples who are black. Likewise, if I were to study European history, I would just as likely find myself focused on individuals and peoples who are white. Regarding American history, it’s more of a mixed bag, but the biggest players in our history have been white. Now, if someone could make a well-reasoned case that aspects of our history centered on blacks are given disproportionately less attention than they deserve based on the significance of the relevant historical events, that would be worth talking about. But that never seems to happen.]

American history has been shaped around the marginalization and exclusion of African-Americans in many arenas. As a result, there are lots of obstacles that have kept African-Americans from being fully integrated or recognized in American history. [This is, or at least was, true.] Their accomplishments have often been occluded. Take technological invention, for instance. Black inventors often didn’t get credit for their inventions, and when they did manage to get patents, white inventors often tried to steal them. Granville Woods, for instance, an engineer and inventor with more than 50 patents to his name, often had to fight off attempts by white inventors to steal his patents. [Engineers fighting over intellectual property rights is certainly not an exclusively inter-racial fixture of the technological world.] Woods is often called “the black Edison,” which I think is really a shame.

What are the most important issues Americans should be discussing during Black History Month?

We should reflect on how far we’ve come – and we’re really good at that – but also on how short we’ve fallen. One of the reasons for the recent popularity of the movie “Selma,” one of the reasons it strikes a chord with so many Americans, is that it reminds us that the issues that people were fighting for back in 1965 are still relevant now – voting rights, in particular. Some parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 have been cut back, and the “voter ID” laws being proposed and passed in many states are a new way to make it more difficult for people to vote. [This is ridiculous. The voter ID laws simply require one to present photo identification prior to voting. I have to present photo identification to purchase a bottle of whiskey. The fact that many blacks are incredibly dysfunctional and consequently lack state-issued photo ID is not evidence of discrimination. Disparate impact does not prove, or even imply, disparate treatment.]

Incarceration is another – there are now more black men in prison today than were enslaved in 1850. [And we’re supposed to assume — in the absence of any evidence — that this is due to systemic racism, rather than accept the simpler explanation which is consistent with daily experience that this follows from the fact that blacks commit crimes at a rate disproportionate to their percentage of the population.] And the decline of public education, another major issue during the civil rights movement, has turned these sacred institutions into school-to-prison pipelines. [Again, how can this be attributed to racism?]

What’s the most important thing African-Americans are saying that the rest of America should hear?

I think lots of African-Americans are saying, look, it’s good that we have a black president, and, yes, we have come a long way. But African-Americans are falling behind and discriminated against in all kinds of measures – housing, employment, health care, the justice system, education, police killings of black citizens. [They aren’t “falling” behind; they ARE behind. Again, the disparity in outcome is not, in and of itself, evidence of systemic racism. In fact, in view of the fact that blacks are less intelligent (on average) than whites and Asians, it is to be expected.] The decline of public education in this country disproportionately affects African-Americans and people are fighting for access to water in Detroit. [Again, how is this evidence of racism?] People should really check out what’s happening with #BlackLivesMatter, which has been trending on social media in recent months. People born after the ’60s so often say they wish they were born at a time when a movement was rising up, and here’s a movement that’s happening right now. [None of my fellow Millennials have ever expressed such a sentiment in my presence. Perhaps I’m out of touch, being out here in the woods and all.]

Happy February, everyone.

It’s that time of year again